Sanguinity ([info]sanguinity) wrote in [info]50books_poc,

Cindy Pon's Silver Phoenix

Via Inkstone on Dreamwidth: The paperback edition of Cindy Pon's Silver Phoenix is being whitewashed.

(For those unfamiliar with the book: on-comm reviews of Cindy Pon's Silver Phoenix; or click the browsible version -- delicious toolbar at the top lets you page through the reviews.)

Inkstone has got jpgs and more details, but here's the short version: Borders never picked it up; Barnes and Noble picked it up in a very limited way; sales were consequently very bad. So the publisher decided to change the cover for the paperback version, as part of an attempt to market it differently:

SilverPhoenix.jpg    SilverPhoenix2.jpg


[info]cindy_pon has herself posted about it:
i’m very well aware of recent discussions about whitewashing young adult covers as well as #racefail debates, especially within the speculative fiction genres. most of you know by now that the author gets very little say in cover design. i was fortunate enough to be consulted on many aspects for the original cover. my debut cover couldn’t have been more fierce or asian! and i’m so grateful to greenwillow books for spending the time, money and effort to repackage my books.
with the hopes that it will be carried more widely and perhaps draw a new audience that my original cover didn’t.

because what matters to me the most has always been the story. i spent two years writing and revising Silver Phoenix, went through the gut wrenching heartache of querying 121 agents so ai ling’s tale could be read. and it’s a dream come true to be published. i never did it for the money, fame or glory (i laugh at the thought!). but on a personal level, i want my stories to be read and on a professional level, read widely enough that more xia fantasy books in the future is a possibility. i do have other xia tales in me! =)

i would love to see more diversity in all ways being published in children’s and young adult genres. i think progress is happening, even if it may seem painfully slow. especially when we feel passionate about it. but change doesn’t happen instantly. i believe success can be achieved through many small triumphs. and it can start simply with a story…

i wanted to take the time here to express my gratitude for all the love i got (and continue to receive!) on the www, from LJ to twitter to blogger, facebook to wordpress and all my online friends in the groups and forums i frequent (many of whom are now real life friends!). your support and enthusiasm for Silver Phoenix means the world to me. and also to the librarians, teachers and booksellers who’ve been so encouraging and kind–thank you!!

if you truly love the original Silver Phoenix cover, please get a hold of a hardcover copy soon! the paperback will feature a “darker” cover to match Fury of the Phoenix.
That's an excerpt; I encourage you to go read her full post.

There are two things that I would like to point out:
  • Authors have little to no control over their book jackets. Cindy Pon is not the person responsible for this cover change.

  • The publisher is keeping this novel in print, and is continuing with its plans to publish the sequel. These are not small things; these are not unimportant things. As much as it sticks in my throat to say it, this cover change may be the necessary cost for keeping the series in print; that's something I cannot judge from here. ETA: Alternatively, I may be falsely buying into poorly-justified "business requires it" non-logic that megwrites describes.

...and I don't know what else I've got. Other than: it breaks my heart to see this. I loved that original cover, and this coyly sleight-of-hand "ambiguous" cover makes me feel ill. Also: I wish this wasn't such a clear demonstration of how thoroughly institutional and structural racisms pervade the book industry. I mean, it's not like I didn't already know -- participation in this challenge can teach you that pretty fast, if you weren't aware before -- but whoah, it's demoralizing watching it happen right in front of you.

Also, to echo Ms. Pon: if you want that gorgeous original cover, go buy the hardback now, while they're still available. I'm buying mine new, btw, despite being an utter cheapskate with respect to books -- there's a part of me that would very much like to see a visible-to-the-publisher demand for that original cover, even if it's too late to keep that cover in print. See ETA3, below.

ETA: Inkstone is hosting linkspam.

ETA2: MegWrites on the double-bind poc-authored and poc-themed books are routinely placed in, with the success or failure of any one poc-themed or poc-authored book always being attributed to the racial aspects of the book and those aspects alone, and the single book itself being used as the bellwether/formula for all poc-authored or poc-themed books.

ETA3: Jonquil points out that the hardback is remaindered, i.e., sales of the hardback at this point are not visible to the publisher. If you want the original cover, buy the hardback (but it will be meaningless to the publisher if you do; they won't even register it as a sale). If you want to support the series staying in print, buy the paperback.
Tags: (delicious)

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 22 comments

[info]recklessblues

July 1 2010, 16:48:36 UTC 1 year ago

Why did anyone think we'd rather have the cover on the right? The cover on the left is beautiful and interesting and it features a beautiful and interesting woman.

The other cover features a mouthbreather with half a head floating in a void (and really poor text positioning, I might add).

Also, pretty much the second we read the back cover copy, we're going to find out that she is Chinese, and then the cover is just going to embarrass all of us. POINTLESS.

I'll be buying the hardcover.

[info]sanguinity

July 2 2010, 15:36:33 UTC 1 year ago

Yeah, that she's-white-no-maybe-she-isn't sleight-of-hand feels like the worse idea ever. As a reader, I've never felt respected when the cover is such a mismatch for the book. And being dissed as a reader always shades my perception of the book.

Deleted comment

[info]kyuuketsukirui

July 2 2010, 00:08:46 UTC 1 year ago

Yeah, it looks like those crappy ebook covers. I expect better from physical books. (I would like to expect better from ebooks, too, but...well. The less said of ebook cover art, the better.)

[info]pretzelcoatl

July 1 2010, 17:07:20 UTC 1 year ago

This makes me really sad. :( I'm glad I managed to get the hardback last year, although I still haven't read it yet. I'll make sure to bump it up on my reading list.

[info]sanguinity

July 2 2010, 15:32:53 UTC 1 year ago

I hope you enjoy it; I really did. Frankly, this comm is what saved fantasy for me: fantasy stories that I had not read before.

[info]neo_prodigy

July 1 2010, 19:06:33 UTC 1 year ago

Boosting the signal on this and cross-posting to [info]foc_u

[info]sanguinity

July 2 2010, 15:31:28 UTC 1 year ago

Thanks!

[info]sithwitch13

July 1 2010, 19:28:35 UTC 1 year ago Edited:  July 1 2010, 19:29:20 UTC

Whitewashing aside, I don't see why anyone would want a lame-ass cover like the one on the right. The one on the left is vibrant and beautiful. That's how I like my covers, eyegrabbing and well laid-out and kick ass. Not burn-dodged into Photoshop hell.

Whitewashing back in, what the hell. Have the past several debacles not taught people that hey, there's enough people who want to spend their money on book covers that are representative of the people actually in the book?

ETA: Here via [info]foc_u, hi!

[info]rootedinsong

July 1 2010, 22:59:03 UTC 1 year ago

Can we please not use words like "lame" here?

[info]sithwitch13

July 2 2010, 04:17:28 UTC 1 year ago

Crap. Thanks for pointing that out.

[info]sanguinity

July 2 2010, 00:19:26 UTC 1 year ago

Hello, and welcome! And yeah, I dunno -- the one on the right is fairly representative of what a lot of YA covers look like nowadays, but even so, there's no need to go so far as to whitewash it. Bah.

And speaking as a mod: please do refrain from using ableist language here.

[info]sithwitch13

July 2 2010, 04:17:46 UTC 1 year ago

Thanks, I won't do so again.

[info]blackteensread2.blogspot.com

July 2 2010, 00:39:17 UTC 1 year ago

Thank you for posting about this. It's truly heartbreaking and I'm tired of people being blamed. It's definitely not the author's fault and I don't think we can continue to debate consumers vs. publishers, whose fault is it. Now we need to take more definite action. I'm upset that Borders refused to sell it and that only a few Barnes and Noble stores would. Booo (can't think of anything more articulate to say, lol).

Off to check out the MegWrites link.

[info]sanguinity

July 2 2010, 15:29:58 UTC 1 year ago

Yeah, these things are exhausting and heartbreaking. And there is definitely a complicated web of things going on, one that makes it hard to effect real change.

The more of us there are working together, though...

[info]tigerbright

July 2 2010, 00:53:26 UTC 1 year ago

The hardcover is available at Powell's; I'm getting a copy.
http://www.powells.com/biblio?show=HARDCOVER%3ASALE%3A9780061780332%3A7.98

[info]trinker

July 2 2010, 03:07:54 UTC 1 year ago

I'm in a distinct minority here...I actually don't like the original cover. I do think that the new cover is bland, and insufficiently representative of the contents. So I don't think the new cover is an improvement. Just...I wish I could love that original.

[info]sanguinity

July 2 2010, 04:12:36 UTC 1 year ago Edited:  July 2 2010, 04:13:23 UTC

*nods* I don't think there's any requirement to love the original cover. Especially since you can do a cover redesign without removing every detail that is identifiably Chinese.

[info]trinker

July 2 2010, 05:49:15 UTC 1 year ago

I've been writing an essay on the challenges of doing a bookcover that's respectfully representative. I'll be asking the community in another post for examples of good and bad covers, if that's okay with the mods.

[info]sanguinity

July 2 2010, 15:07:40 UTC 1 year ago

Yes, you may, if you keep the on-comm discussion focused on books by authors of color.

[info]silverfyshxin

July 2 2010, 08:46:51 UTC 1 year ago

I agree with this. I wish I could like that original, and while there are aspects of it I do like, something about it doesn't appeal to me.

But I also think the other one is worse, and the cover for Fury of the Phoenix is worse still.

[info]username371

July 2 2010, 14:31:45 UTC 1 year ago

It looks to me like they wanted to follow the trend set by many dark, gothic YA novels, especially paranormal romance like Twilight. I've seen many covers like that where they cut the eyes/whole face of the female MC (which is very lame) and show her hand or cleverage or something. Just look at these covers.

I like the original cover. Yes, it's colorful but I'm kinda sick of the gothic darkness in the YA genre. The editing in the cover could be better, but the new one is worse about that.

And you're right, the new cover has nothing Chinese in it. It makes me think more "medieval Europe" if anything.

[info]sanguinity

July 2 2010, 15:23:24 UTC 1 year ago

Yeah, the new design made me think of the cover of Tantalize. (Which has its own look-alike issue, I see.) At least Tantalize actually is about a white girl (although she's Italian-American; I cannot remember if she is blonde or not).

Hah. The styling made me think contemporary USian high school. Vague, vague, vague.

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…